A review of the Scalable World ETF
Scalable Capital was the first German neobroker to launch its own world ETF together with Xtrackers and promises structural outperformance - but what's behind it?
- Level: For everyone
- Reading duration: 7 minutes
What to expect in this article
The "Scalable MSCI AC World Xtrackers UCITS ETF" in review
Shortly after the Munich-based fintech Scalable Capital announced far-reaching changes in the winter of 2024, it launched a new world ETF together with the Frankfurt-based asset manager DWS and its ETF subsidiary Xtrackers. In addition to a new replication method - which has not previously been available in this form for ETFs in Europe - the two companies have come up with a few other things to rival existing world ETFs.Update: Scalable ETF cracks 250 million Euro fund volume
After a good six months, the ETF has already collected a quarter of a billion Euros from private investors, confirming the interest of many ETF fans in the fund's new approach. In this article, we take a closer look at the product.
After a good six months, the ETF has already collected a quarter of a billion Euros from private investors, confirming the interest of many ETF fans in the fund's new approach. In this article, we take a closer look at the product.
The most important facts at a glance
- The Scalable ETF tracks the MSCI ACWI
- It invests in 23 industrialised and 24 emerging markets (large and mid-caps)
- TER of 0.00 % for the start (after the first year, the TER of 0.17 % p.a. applies)
- Innovative "hybrid replication method": ETF tracks the index using both physical and synthetic replication
- ETF promises structural outperformance of around 22 basis points per year (before TER) compared to other global ETFs
- The fund reinvests its income directly in the fund volume
- The ETF is launched in Luxembourg (LU-ISIN)
- Xtrackers manages the ETF
- Scalable Capital is active as a "Portfolio Construction Advisor" in an advisory role
- Important: The product can be traded via all common brokers and trading centres in Germany (and many other European countries), i.e. not only via Scalable Capital itself
Structural outperformance through innovative "hybrid replication"?
Let's start with the new hybrid replication method used by the ETF. Until now, replication methods of ETFs were explained relatively simply: Either the ETF replicates its index directly by buying the securities contained in the index (physical replication) or it tracks it with the help of a financial swap (swap / synthetic replication).justETF Tip: In our article "Hybrid Replication: The Next Big Thing for ETFs?" we took a closer look at the special features of the new hybrid replication method.
Why does the ETF use two different replication methods?
This methodology enables the ETF to replicate the various regions or submarkets as efficiently as possible. This may sound complex at first glance, but in the end it is exactly what many investors already do with individual ETFs in their portfolios, some of which are physically replicating and others synthetically replicating - only that it is combined in one ETF. Although the concept of hybrid replication is new, the processes behind it are well-known and proven. The synthetic replication of US equities for example offers a tax advantage for UCITS ETFs launched in Europe. How so? While physically replicating ETFs have to pay 15 % (ETFs launched in Ireland) or 30 % (ETFs launched in other countries) withholding tax on income from US equities, this withholding tax does not apply to synthetic ETFs. As investments are not made directly in distributing US equities, no withholding tax-relevant income is incurred. Scalable Capital therefore also uses corresponding ETFs for its own robo-advisor. The same applies to Chinese A-shares, which can be modelled much more efficiently in a synthetical than physical way.Advantages of synthetic replication of Chinese A-shares
For many professional investors (such as hedge funds) Chinese mainland stocks (A-shares) are an interesting asset class. However, these investors often have limited access, for example for short selling (= taking short positions) to hedge their market risk. As a result, these market participants are prepared to pay the swap counterparties of synthetic ETFs (usually large banks) a premium on the short exposure to which the counterparties are exposed. This additional premium is partially passed on to investors in synthetic A-share ETFs and has historically led to outperformance. The premium can fluctuate over time and is primarily dependent on the demand of these market participants. By optimising replication in this way, the ETF increases the expected return. A comparison of the largest ETFs on the S&P 500 shows that this leads to performance advantages in the long term. If we look at the oldest physical (orange line) and synthetic ETF (blue line), the swap-based fund is actually ahead over the given period. At least in the case of funds with a similar TER, the advantage of the withholding tax savings described above actually seems to apply (15.56 % p.a. to 15.28 % p.a.).
For many professional investors (such as hedge funds) Chinese mainland stocks (A-shares) are an interesting asset class. However, these investors often have limited access, for example for short selling (= taking short positions) to hedge their market risk. As a result, these market participants are prepared to pay the swap counterparties of synthetic ETFs (usually large banks) a premium on the short exposure to which the counterparties are exposed. This additional premium is partially passed on to investors in synthetic A-share ETFs and has historically led to outperformance. The premium can fluctuate over time and is primarily dependent on the demand of these market participants. By optimising replication in this way, the ETF increases the expected return. A comparison of the largest ETFs on the S&P 500 shows that this leads to performance advantages in the long term. If we look at the oldest physical (orange line) and synthetic ETF (blue line), the swap-based fund is actually ahead over the given period. At least in the case of funds with a similar TER, the advantage of the withholding tax savings described above actually seems to apply (15.56 % p.a. to 15.28 % p.a.).
Comparison: Physical vs. synthetic S&P 500 ETF
Source: justETF Research; as at 16/12/2024
In addition to the advantages of the dynamic replication method, the ETF managed by Xtrackers also relies on securities lending to generate additional income for investors. The "structural outperformance" expected by the providers is said to amount to around 22 basis points per year. At least when looking at the two S&P 500 ETFs mentioned above, it can be stated that this was possible in the past due to the swap construction.
Comparison: How the world ETF from Scalable and Xtrackers differs from the competition
Before we share our conclusion on the new world ETF with you, let's take a look at how the ETF from Scalable Capital and Xtrackers differs from the competition.The world ETF from Scalable and Xtrackers compared to the "rest of the world"
| ETF | Scalable MSCI AC World Xtrackers | SPDR MSCI ACWI | iShares MSCI ACWI | Amundi MSCI All Country World | SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | Invesco FTSE All World | Vanguard FTSE All World | Amundi Prime All Country World |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | MSCI ACWI | MSCI ACWI | MSCI ACWI | MSCI ACWI | MSCI ACWI IMI | FTSE All World | FTSE All World | Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap |
| TER (p.a.) | 0.00 %1 | 0.12 % | 0.20 % | 0.45 % | 0.17 % | 0.15 % | 0.22 % | 0.07 % |
| Replication method | Hybrid | Optimised sampling | Optimised sampling | Synthetic replication | Optimised sampling | Optimised sampling | Optimised sampling | Full replication |
| Distribution of income | Accumulating | Accumulating | Accumulating | Accumulating | Accumulating | Accumulating | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Fund domicile | Luxembourg | Ireland | Ireland | Luxembourg | Ireland | Ireland | Ireland | Ireland |
| AuM (in € million) | 252 | 3,952 | 18,546 | 1,696 | 2,579 | 1,526 | 20,750 | 229 |
| Launch date | 2024 | 2011 | 2011 | 2011 | 2011 | 2023 | 2019 | 2024 |
| Swap replication of US & CN (A) | ||||||||
| Securities lending |
Source: justETF Research, Scalable Capital; as of 30/07/2025
1TER in the first year, thereafter 0.17 % p.a.
A look at the table shows that the Scalable ETF with its regular TER of 0.17 % is roughly in line with other global ETFs. The TER reduction to 0.00 % in the first year puts the ETF at the top - at least for this period.
Just like the other MSCI ACWI, FTSE All World and Solactive products, the ETF focuses on large and mid-caps. Small caps are only found in SPDR's MSCI ACWI IMI among the aforementioned competitors.
However, the ETF is the only one to offer hybrid replication and thus offers both securities lending and structural outperformance opportunities thanks to the hybrid replication method. No other ETF so far combines these two things.
1TER in the first year, thereafter 0.17 % p.a.
















