Nasdaq 100 vs S&P 500 Equal Weight in comparison
Find the best index: Nasdaq 100 vs S&P 500 Equal Weight - compare performance and key attributes
Comparison in detail
| Nasdaq 100 ISIN US6311011026 | Ticker A0AE1X Based on iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) | S&P 500 Equal Weight |
Nasdaq 100 +31.46%
S&P 500 Equal Weight +20.94%
The performance of the indices is based on the reference ETFs and is displayed in the selected currency.
Basics
| Index | |||
| Index | Nasdaq 100® | S&P 500® Equal Weight | |
| Index description | |||
| Index description | The Nasdaq 100® index tracks a selection of 100 stocks chosen from among non-financial stocks listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange. | The S&P 500® Equal Weight (EWI) index tracks large cap US stocks equally weighted with a fixed weight of 0.20%. | |
| Investment focus | |||
| Investment focus | Equity, United States | Equity, United States, Equal Weighted | |
| Investment approach | |||
| Investment approach | Long-only | Long-only | |
| Sustainability | |||
| Sustainability | No | No | |
| Volatility 1 year (in EUR) | |||
| Volatility 1 year (in EUR) | 18.82% | 11.49% | |
| Factsheet | |||
| Factsheet | |||
| Index Methodology | |||
| Index Methodology | - | ||
Holdings
| Holdings in ETF | |||
| Holdings in ETF | 103 | 503 | |
| Holdings in Index | |||
| Holdings in Index | 100 | 500 | |
| Weight of top 10 holdings | |||
| Weight of top 10 holdings | 46.15% | 3.17% | |
| Top 10 Holdings | |||
| Top 10 Holdings | NVIDIA Corp. 8.48% | Moderna 0.56% | |
| Apple 7.39% | Veeva Systems 0.32% | ||
| Microsoft Corp 5.98% | Zebra Technologies 0.31% | ||
| Micron Technology 4.74% | DoorDash 0.29% | ||
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.44% | Charles River Labs /US 0.29% | ||
| AMD 3.36% | Expedia Group, Inc. 0.28% | ||
| Alphabet, Inc. A 3.14% | Salesforce, Inc. 0.28% | ||
| Tesla 2.92% | Workday 0.28% | ||
| Alphabet, Inc. C 2.91% | Airbnb 0.28% | ||
| Broadcom Inc. 2.79% | Global Payments 0.28% | ||
| United States 94.08% | United States 95.44% | ||
| United Kingdom 1.65% | Ireland 2.06% | ||
| Netherlands 1.32% | Other 2.50% | ||
| Other 2.95% | - | ||
| Technology 66.60% | Finance 20.88% | ||
| Consumer Non-Cyclicals 11.63% | Technology 15.31% | ||
| Healthcare 3.99% | Industrials 13.61% | ||
| Consumer Cyclicals 3.38% | Healthcare 12.87% | ||
| Other 14.40% | Other 37.33% | ||
Performance
| YTD | |||
| YTD | +28.03% | +18.31% | |
| 1 month | |||
| 1 month | +8.40% | +3.35% | |
| 3 months | |||
| 3 months | +5.29% | +2.17% | |
| 6 months | |||
| 6 months | +28.17% | +14.45% | |
| 1 year | |||
| 1 year | +31.46% | +20.94% | |
| 3 years | |||
| 3 years | +93.86% | +50.21% | |
| 5 years | |||
| 5 years | +120.25% | +55.15% | |
| Since inception (MAX) | |||
| Since inception (MAX) | +2,239.21% | +304.32% | |
| 2025 | |||
| 2025 | +6.58% | -1.90% | |
| 2024 | |||
| 2024 | +33.29% | +19.62% | |
| 2023 | |||
| 2023 | +49.07% | +9.40% | |
| 2022 | |||
| 2022 | -28.50% | -6.50% | |
Risk
| Volatility 1 year | |||
| Volatility 1 year | 18.82% | 11.49% | |
| Volatility 3 years | |||
| Volatility 3 years | 20.53% | 14.65% | |
| Volatility 5 years | |||
| Volatility 5 years | 23.18% | 16.75% | |
| Return per risk 1 year | |||
| Return per risk 1 year | 1.67 | 1.82 | |
| Return per risk 3 years | |||
| Return per risk 3 years | 1.20 | 0.99 | |
| Return per risk 5 years | |||
| Return per risk 5 years | 0.74 | 0.55 | |
| Maximum drawdown 1 year | |||
| Maximum drawdown 1 year | -11.27% | -6.04% | |
| Maximum drawdown 3 years | |||
| Maximum drawdown 3 years | -26.49% | -21.16% | |
| Maximum drawdown 5 years | |||
| Maximum drawdown 5 years | -31.43% | -21.16% | |
| Maximum drawdown since inception | |||
| Maximum drawdown since inception | -31.43% | -38.93% | |
Invest in ETFs
— Data provided by Trackinsight, etfinfo, Xignite Inc., gettex, FactSet and justETF GmbH. Quotes are either real-time (gettex) or 15 minutes delayed stock exchange quotes or NAVs (daily published by the fund provider). By default, ETF returns include dividend payments (if applicable). There is no warranty for completeness, accuracy and correctness for the displayed information.
