How quickly can stocks rebound after a bad year?

justETF Logo

2022 was a tough year for equity markets – so how long does it take for returns to bounce back?

How quickly can stocks rebound after a bad year?
 
  • Level: For Advanced
  • Reading duration: 15 minutes
What to expect in this article
Equity markets are the ultimate comeback kids. They’re forced onto the retreat one year in three on average – so as ETF investors we all know what it’s like to take some pain. But despite the hard knocks, equities normally come roaring back – the only question is how long does the rebound take?
We’ve scoured investing’s history books to find out the answer to that question. But to ensure we’re not fooling ourselves, we’ve focussed on the very worst annual setbacks on record.
If equities can shrug off the World Wars, the Great Depression, and wild inflationary periods, then we’ll probably be OK after 2022. If you’re a new investor then you may be shocked by the size of the losses inflicted on German, French, Italian, and Spanish investors during the darkest episodes of the Twentieth Century.
We’ll compare those meltdowns with US and World equities too – as a salutary reminder of the importance of diversification.
OK, it’s time to grit your teeth and hold the hand of a loved one, as we reveal the worst the markets can throw at you, and how long it took to come out the other side …
justETF note
We examined the worst single-year total returns for the US, German, French, Italian, Spanish, and World stock markets. Each table also shows the market’s total returns 1-year, 3-years, and 10-years after each event. Returns are inflation-adjusted and reported in each country’s home currency, or the Euro where appropriate. We test against the longest historical record allowed by each dataset.

US - Top 10 Worst Annual Returns 1872 - 2022

Year Real total return *+1 year * +3 years  * +5 years  *+ 10 years  10yr annualised
1907 -31.9 46.1 56.4 74.6 31.3 2.8
1917 -34.9 5.6 -21.7 35.1 234 12.8
1920 -29 27.5 75.4 175.9 355.2 16.4
1930 -21.1 -34.4 1.53 36.9 40.5 3.5
1931 -34.4 -3.8 46.3 180.5 83.5 6.3
1937 -33.1 22.3 14.2 1.8 48.9 4.1
1973 -21.4 -32.8 -1.8 -13 28.2 2.5
1974 -32.8 26.2 29.2 39.6 91.8 6.7
2002 -21.3 19.4 35.8 55.4 51 4.2
2008 -41 29.5 43.9 110.3 199.8 11.6
Source: justETF Research; Data source: JST Macrohistory (26.02.2023)
The US’s worst calendar years reveal most of the major events that scarred markets over the past 150 years:
  • World War One plus the influenza pandemic and high inflation that followed
  • The Great Depression of the 1930s
  • World War Two and post-war inflation (US losses were relatively light in comparison to other countries)
  • The 1973-74 Oil Crisis
  • The Dotcom Bust in the early noughties
  • The Global Financial Crisis of the late noughties
Despite the human and financial cost of these tragedies, US equities have typically rebounded at speed – driven by the belief that market competition, innovation, and the desire to overcome our challenges translates into wealth and profits down the line.
As the table shows, the markets put in a strong positive performance within one year of a major downturn in the majority of cases. After five years, investors were up in nine out of ten scenarios, and 100% of the timelines were positive after 10 years.
The 10-year annualised return column shows that investors were making spectacular profits fully one-third of the time versus the US average annual return of 6.8%.
Granted, four of the ten-year annualised returns could be described as sub-average, but all were happily in the black.
As we’re all aware, the world’s sternest tests can take many years to resolve. But the table is testament to the strength of the US, and shows how investors are eventually rewarded for their patience.
justETF note
2022’s drop would make the US market’s top 10 worst years list but has been excluded because we don’t yet know how the subsequent years will turn out.

Germany – Top 10 Worst Annual Returns 1871 - 2022

Year Real total return *+1 year * +3 years  * +5 years  *+ 10 years  10yr annualised
1918 -40.3 19.7 40.3 576.4 14.2 1.3
1920 -31.3 70.7 723 -38.4 -19.2 -2.1
1924 -87.4 -40.4 24.2 3.2 -6.6 -0.7
1925 -40.4 136.1 125.4 31.1 78.7 6
1930 -24.2 -28.4 7.4 36.3 151.5 9.7
1931 -28.4 27.8 66.7 -145.2 268.9 13.9
1948 -90 121.3 337.5 565.6 2021.2 35.7
1987 -33.7 26.3 46.3 48.5 231 12.7
2002 -40.7 36.1 82.5 161.9 125.6 8.5
2008 -44.1 25.1 21.8 92.3 113.8 7.9
Source: justETF Research; Data source: JST Macrohistory (26.02.2023)
The German experience is dominated by the trauma of the early Twentieth Century and inevitably forces us to contemplate the horror of war.
The stock market itself can be thought of as a barometer of both human accomplishment and our hopes for the future. Judged purely in those terms, we can see how German equities reflected the reaction of ordinary people to extraordinary events.
The table is wrought by violent swings in optimism and pessimism. The 1948 row captures the volatility best as we contrast the 90% loss of 1948 with the unbelievable 2021% gain a decade later. That translated into an astonishing 35.7% 10-year annualised return – the largest across our entire sample.
No-one who thought they had lost everything in 1948 could possibly have hoped for such a turnaround in fortune.
The table conceals two more important points about the market.
  1. Most of the positive 10-year annualised returns are far higher than the German market’s 4% historical average return. Exceptional profits can be made by those who aren’t too frightened to invest after a bad year, although there are no guarantees.
  2. Moreover, the overall average return for the German stock market since that 1948 meltdown is a superb 8.9% annualised. Since the Global Financial Crisis, the figure is 6.2% annualised.
Those numbers are far in excess of what you can earn from less risky assets.
The table reveals what happens when the worst risks materialise. But if humanity can avoid the mistakes of the past – and you can weather turbulent periods – then we can be confident we’ll be rewarded by the markets over the long-term.

France – Top 10 Worst Annual Returns 1871 - 2022

Year Real total return *+1 year * +3 years  * +5 years  *+ 10 years  10yr annualised
19120 -32.7 9.9 59.1 56.5 81.5 6.1
1930 -27.5 -29.1 1.5 7.2 12.3 1.2
1931 -29.1 36.6 37.4 66.8 106.6 7.5
1943 -33.6 -27.9 -67.5 -90 -90.1 -21.3
1944 -27.9 -46.1 -75.4 -90 -72.7 -12.2
1945 -46.1 -16.5 -74.3 -85.2 -51.8 -7
1947 -45.4 -43.7 -67.5 -59.1 15.5 1.5
1948 -43.7 -25.3 -28.6 -8.8 63.7 5.1
2002 -30.6 18.7 65.8 103 54.6 4.5
2008 -42.5 28.9 12.2 60.5 112.8 7.8
Source: justETF Research; Data source: JST Macrohistory (26.02.2023)
The French stock market suffers from the worst long-term returns in our sample.
In the unlikely event you started your investing career in wartorn 1943 then you lost over 90% during the next decade.
Overall, the French market is a cautionary tale about the dangers of over-concentration.
All was well from 1871 to 1914. Investors earned a healthy 5% annualised return until World War One.
And from 1978 to 2022, French equities returned a remarkable 7.5% annualised.
But the market was a disaster from 1913 to 1977. It lost 98% of its value over 64 years.
Not even the bursting of the 1989 Japanese stock market bubble can compete with that decline.
Why were French equities so bad?
The damage was done by extremely high post-war inflation, plus the impact of nationalising many industries (alongside other market controls), on top of the havoc wreaked by the World Wars and the Great Depression.
Market reform rejuvenated French equities during the 1980s and – as you can see in the table’s 2002 and 2008 rows – they now act much like other developed country stocks.
The French example illustrates that choices made by policymakers can adversely affect investors over long periods in ways that aren’t necessarily reflected in a country’s overall economic performance.
That’s why globally diversifying against single-country risk is a key weapon in every investor’s armoury.
It’s also, incidentally, why you shouldn’t assume that the US market will continue to dominate the rest of the world in the future as it has done since the Global Financial Crisis.

Italy – Top 10 Worst Annual Returns 1871 - 2022

Year Real total return *+1 year * +3 years  * +5 years  *+ 10 years  10yr annualised
1920 -37.7 -25.4 32.9 92.7 62.7 5
1926 -43.5 44.7 68.9 20.2 203.4 11.7
1944 -43.4 -72.9 -72.8 -64.2 -23.5 -2.6
1945 -72.9 120.5 20.8 46 194.5 11.4
1947 -54.5 20.4 45.6 101.7 204.9 11.8
1974 -39.5 -16.1 -57.6 -52.3 -34.7 -4.2
1977 -36.3 17.4 70.7 23 215.6 12.2
1987 -31.7 21.8 -12.8 -19.6 89.2 6.6
2002 -32.4 -1.2 33.7 33.3 296.6 14.8
2008 -48.6 21.6 -15.3 12.4 31 2.7
Source: justETF Research; Data source: JST Macrohistory (26.02.2023)
Italian single year losses are brutal. The market has also suffered a contemporary bear market on a scale comparable with the World War losses for other countries – the 85% fall that ravaged Italian stocks from 1962 to 1977.
That said, the 10-year annualised returns show that the fightback by Italian equities is often vigorous and far more rewarding than the historic average return of 2.4%.
Italian returns further reinforce the point that there have been two major golden eras for European investing that bookend a long-term malaise:
Era Italian stock market annualised returns (%)
 
1871-1914 5.2
1914-1977 -1.4
1978-2022 5.3
As with the French experience, Italy’s track record suggests that the key components for investing success include avoiding major wars and outbreaks of high inflation while maintaining competitive, open markets.

Spain – Top 10 Worst Annual Returns 1900 - 2022

Year Real total return *+1 year * +3 years  * +5 years  *+ 10 years  10yr annualised
1918 -22.1 0 22.8 98.6 321.3 15.5
1931 -24.7 -8.8 3 47.1 35.7 3.1
1948 -33.9 -15 -10.7 2.4 82.6 6.2
1958 -22.2 -11.8 12.1 33.1 47.5 4
1975 -24.7 -24.3 -68.9 -78 -61 -9
1976 -24.3 -42.8 -66.7 -63.9 1.1 0.1
1977 -42.8 -27.6 -49.2 -44.8 148.3 9.5
1978 -27.6 -19.7 -12.8 23.6 274.1 14.1
2002 -22.9 29.1 87.6 170.5 69.3 5.4
2008 -39.4 36 0.8 32.3 35.9 3.1
Source: justETF Research; Data source: JST Macrohistory (26.02.2023)
Spain’s worst returns are not dominated by war to the same extent as other European countries but by the -85% bear market that rampaged between 1974 and 1980.
Zooming in on those years shows what a difference a single year or two of bad returns makes to your 10-year outcome.
For example, the 10-year annualised return post-1975 is -9% whereas it’s a strong 9.5% after 1977, and a smashing 14.1% after 1978.
The fact is that even the 1975 investor came good eventually. But it’s a much longer wait if you have to endure a multi-year meltdown of extreme magnitude.
Your best defence against this type of event is ensuring you’re invested across every strategic asset class – from bonds (nominal and index-linked) to gold to global equities.

The World – Top 10 Worst Annual Returns 1970 - 2022

Year Real total return *+1 year * +3 years  * +5 years  *+ 10 years  10yr annualised
1973 -33.7 -42.1 -30.5 -46.6 -13.6 -1.4
1974 -42.1 28.8 -2 -10.7 68.6 5.4
1977 -18.3 -5.9 14.1 18.4 80 6.1
1987 -8.2 35.1 2.2 13.1 116.2 8
1990 -29.4 15.4 38.7 34.6 217.1 12.2
1994 -9.5 7.2 68.5 179.2 62.9 5
2000 -9.6 -14.1 -38 -20.4 -28.3 -3.3
2001 -14.1 -33.6 -24.9 -2.4 -20.7 -2.3
2002 -33.6 8.6 39.4 40.2 33.1 2.9
2008 -38.6 24.8 38.6 85.9 169 10.4
Source: justETF Research; Data source: JST Macrohistory (26.02.2023)
To round off, let’s look at the resilience of globally diversified equities during a period mercifully free of world war catastrophe.
The MSCI World index (as tracked by many ETFs) has suffered its share of setbacks since its launch in 1970. But the majority of the losses evaporated after three years.
Two out of three of the negative 10-year scenarios are associated with the Dotcom Bust. Unfortunately, those investors ran into the Global Financial Crisis before making good their earlier woes.
In the longer run, they did just fine.
Although the 2001 investor had to wait for 14 years to reach profitability. The 1973 and 2002 investors were back in the black after 12 years, and subsequently enjoyed above average returns.
Most of the other timelines in our World worst list had their returns super-charged on the rebound as shown by the 10-year annualised column.
Remember that over 5% annualised is historically exceptional after inflation.
justETF note
Last year’s hefty MSCI World loss would earn it a place in our Top 10 but we’ve discarded that result as we don’t yet know how it will play out.

Hold the line and give it time

Of course, the historical record doesn’t tell us what will happen in the future and there are no guarantees.
However, we’ve looked into the market’s all-time nightmare scenarios during this post. If even these calamities aren’t fatal then you can almost certainly overcome any difficult years that lie ahead.
It’s also worth noting that there’s no significant connection between a bad year and the next year’s return. While our emotions may tell us to hunker down until the smoke has cleared, our head should tell us that markets can bounce back in a flash.
And as we’ve seen, excellent opportunities await level-headed investors who can stay calm and pick up equities on sale.
Finally, the numbers quoted are based on 100% equity portfolios invested entirely at a market high on the eve of disaster. There are vanishingly few people who invest like this.
In the real world, results are much improved by implementing straightforward portfolio management strategies. For example:
justETF tip: Find out about these techniques and more in our justETF Academy.
Stay up to date
Free newsletter including the latest news & knowledge about investing in ETFs.
Subscribe now
 
Become an ETF expert with our monthly newsletter
 
Sign up free now